<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>delhi &amp;mdash; meetdheeraj</title>
    <link>https://meetdheeraj.writeas.com/tag:delhi</link>
    <description>They say you die and with you goes your body and bones. Pufff! But your thoughts, how you made people feel, the ideas you helped take root outlive you. Be Kind!</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 23:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>While His Defeat Was Inevitable; Kejriwal Is Free And More Dangerous For The BJP Now Than He Ever Was</title>
      <link>https://meetdheeraj.writeas.com/while-his-defeat-was-inevitable-kejriwal-is-free-and-more-dangerous-for-the?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[While AAP lost to BJP, Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia were also defeated in their respective constituencies&#xA;While AAP lost to BJP, Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia were also defeated in their respective constituencies&#xA;&#xA;Many, especially people in Delhi, saw this coming. In a way, it is good. Or as someone mentioned, it was inevitable. Just like how it was important to defeat UPA at the height of their powers and ego trip in 2014, equally, it had become important and necessary to defeat the politics of Arvind Kejriwal. He was thinking that a mini-version of BJP&#39;s politics was the strategy to go by. He repeatedly projected himself as the better version of BJP&#39;s divisive politics - as if he could hate Muslims but continue to also provide free public services. At every step of the way in recent times, he projected himself as more religious and narrowminded than the BJP. He even avoided supporting his own Muslim legislator and rallied against admitting children of migrants in schools. Forget about his actions concerning Shaheen Bagh and CAA. And of course, he had grown hubris that he could not be defeated in Delhi and had gotten too comfortable which politicians should never be made to feel for the public&#39;s own good.!--more--&#xA;&#xA;That said, it is concerning what replaces Kejriwal now and UPA then. But again, it also tells the options the public is provided. How they try to avoid the devil and how they eventually give up and choose an open devil rather than the masked monster who hides its claws.&#xA;&#xA;Silver lining wise, Kejriwal is a shrewd politician, unlike Rahul and others. Despite this defeat, he in past has repeatedly shown he knows how to fight the BJP on their turf by twisting and turning the designs to suit him better. Now that he has lost his fiefdom, he has nothing more to lose or concentrate his focus on. BJP can no longer create problems in the capital and keep him engaged. Add to it, unlike the old Kejriwal, this one will have his men in the assembly and parliament who can speak and tomtom his message. If he is up to it, and in all likelihood he will be, he&#39;s going to be a hard and harsh thorn in BJP&#39;s path from here on.&#xA;&#xA;Congratulations to all, we are in for good times. Politics in India is going to be a good show from now on.&#xA;&#xA;P.S. It is a good time here to remember how the BJP using all sorts of powers and agencies including the courts, almost paralysed Kejriwal&#39;s government from working. At the start of his government, Kejriwal using ACB had initiated corruption investigations against Ambani and other heavyweights. Modi government to stop this, passed a fresh law pulling ACB from the control of the Delhi government. Delhi Police was already under Modi government so he was left with nothing to fight corruption and other misdoings. Later on, a new LG was appointed who would refuse to pass any bills and files Kejriwal signed including transfers of officials. Even door-to-door ration and government services were stopped. Kejriwal still found ways to work around these blockers. Then one by one his closest allies and later himself were arrested and kept behind bars. All the cases against his MLAs eventually fizzled out, and nothing could be proved in court but by the time cases could be finished and clean chit was given, his ministers would have spent years (two, three etc) in prison. While it is always hard to pinpoint why people unseat someone and crown another and many times there are always multiple reasons for how people vote, in Delhi&#39;s case, voters might just have gotten frustrated as well from this constant tussle. It&#39;s not like they could not see how Modi halted Kejriwal on each step he took.&#xA;&#xA;cartoon&#xA;&#xA;#delhi #politics #arvindkejriwal #narendramodi #bjp #aap #elections]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://dheerajdeekay.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/image-1.png" alt="While AAP lost to BJP, Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia were also defeated in their respective constituencies"/>
While AAP lost to BJP, Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia were also defeated in their respective constituencies</p>

<p>Many, especially people in Delhi, saw this coming. In a way, it is good. Or as someone mentioned, it was inevitable. Just like how it was important to defeat UPA at the height of their powers and ego trip in 2014, equally, it had become important and necessary to defeat the politics of Arvind Kejriwal. He was thinking that a mini-version of BJP&#39;s politics was the strategy to go by. He repeatedly projected himself as the better version of BJP&#39;s divisive politics – as if he could hate Muslims but continue to also provide free public services. At every step of the way in recent times, he projected himself as more religious and narrowminded than the BJP. He even avoided supporting his own Muslim legislator and rallied against admitting children of migrants in schools. Forget about his actions concerning Shaheen Bagh and CAA. And of course, he had grown hubris that he could not be defeated in Delhi and had gotten too comfortable which politicians should never be made to feel for the public&#39;s own good.</p>

<p>That said, it is concerning what replaces Kejriwal now and UPA then. But again, it also tells the options the public is provided. How they try to avoid the devil and how they eventually give up and choose an open devil rather than the masked monster who hides its claws.</p>

<p>Silver lining wise, Kejriwal is a shrewd politician, unlike Rahul and others. Despite this defeat, he in past has repeatedly shown he knows how to fight the BJP on their turf by twisting and turning the designs to suit him better. Now that he has lost his fiefdom, he has nothing more to lose or concentrate his focus on. BJP can no longer create problems in the capital and keep him engaged. Add to it, unlike the old Kejriwal, this one will have his men in the assembly and parliament who can speak and tomtom his message. If he is up to it, and in all likelihood he will be, he&#39;s going to be a hard and harsh thorn in BJP&#39;s path from here on.</p>

<p>Congratulations to all, we are in for good times. Politics in India is going to be a good show from now on.</p>

<p><em>P.S. It is a good time here to remember how the BJP using all sorts of powers and agencies including the courts, almost paralysed Kejriwal&#39;s government from working. At the start of his government, Kejriwal using ACB had initiated corruption investigations against Ambani and other heavyweights. Modi government to stop this, passed a fresh law pulling ACB from the control of the Delhi government. Delhi Police was already under Modi government so he was left with nothing to fight corruption and other misdoings. Later on, a new LG was appointed who would refuse to pass any bills and files Kejriwal signed including transfers of officials. Even door-to-door ration and government services were stopped. Kejriwal still found ways to work around these blockers. Then one by one his closest allies and later himself were arrested and kept behind bars. All the cases against his MLAs eventually fizzled out, and nothing could be proved in court but by the time cases could be finished and clean chit was given, his ministers would have spent years (two, three etc) in prison. While it is always hard to pinpoint why people unseat someone and crown another and many times there are always multiple reasons for how people vote, in Delhi&#39;s case, voters might just have gotten frustrated as well from this constant tussle. It&#39;s not like they could not see how Modi halted Kejriwal on each step he took.</em></p>

<p><img src="https://dheerajdeekay.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/image.png" alt="cartoon"/></p>

<p><a href="https://meetdheeraj.writeas.com/tag:delhi" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">delhi</span></a> <a href="https://meetdheeraj.writeas.com/tag:politics" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">politics</span></a> <a href="https://meetdheeraj.writeas.com/tag:arvindkejriwal" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">arvindkejriwal</span></a> <a href="https://meetdheeraj.writeas.com/tag:narendramodi" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">narendramodi</span></a> <a href="https://meetdheeraj.writeas.com/tag:bjp" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">bjp</span></a> <a href="https://meetdheeraj.writeas.com/tag:aap" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">aap</span></a> <a href="https://meetdheeraj.writeas.com/tag:elections" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">elections</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://meetdheeraj.writeas.com/while-his-defeat-was-inevitable-kejriwal-is-free-and-more-dangerous-for-the</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2025 16:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>End Of Innocence</title>
      <link>https://meetdheeraj.writeas.com/end-of-innocence?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[The plant that we so diligently watered and cared for has grown into a big banyan; full of flowers and fruits. Own it now.&#xA;&#xA;Burning of property while mob throws stones&#xA;&#xA;53 people have lost their lives in the Delhi riots. You have heard this already. But do you see the problem here? Riot? Was it really a riot? Is it a riot if the state machinery and police take sides; forget keeping silent while mobs went on a rampage but Delhi police took stones in their own hands and threw them at the other side, they directed and aided one side of the mob (as if there was another side anyway), they climbed and destroyed CCTV cameras. Yes, police did all this. It’s all on record. There are videos after videos that prove all this. How then can we call it a riot? It was a pogrom. As Rana Ayyub called, state-sponsored anti-Muslim pogrom. Let’s call it what it was. Now that we have settled on the calling business, let’s get on to our language. !--more-- The 53 dead bodies, actually in some cases, there were no bodies, only a limb which police would not give permission to even DNA test, had both Hindu and Muslim names. And because there were dead bodies from both the sides, we are told it was both-sided violence. Like a cricket match where you fix a date and then come prepared on the scheduled date to hit fours and sixes? An equal opportunity contest is how one person put it to me. But really? Then why are dead bodies so disproportionate? Is it because Hindu men are disproportionately stronger than Muslim men? If so, what is “Hindu Khatre mein hain” all about? A cleverly masterminded political strategy to make the majority feel threatened by the minority? Why only Muslim places of worship were torched and desecrated? Why only the Quran has been burnt and its pages are torn down? Why was it that only Hindu mob got to climb a pillar of a mosque and place a saffron flag (considered Hindu flag) on it? What problem did Muslim men have in climbing a pillar of a temple? Is it that their legs are weak, unlike Hindu men who could so easily climb atop the minaret of a mosque? Or is it that Muslims did not come prepared with their own flags? Did no one inform them that there’s going to be a match on a certain date? Are you getting what I’m saying? Actually, I don’t care what you get and what you don’t. I want to say it because what is being said on TV, on online by influential faces makes no sense. For weeks unless Coronavirus happened on tv, we were busy showing Tahir Hussain and Shahrukh, and family of Ankit who was killed in this pogrom, so much so that, it was feeling as if it was not Hindu men but Muslim men colluded with Delhi police and not slogans of “Jai Shri Ram” but “Allah Hu Akbar” that echoed in Delhi for three days. WhatsApp and social media were then flooded with pictures of Tahir Hussain’s terrace. In all this, nobody cared to question Delhi police on its disastrous flip-flop.&#xA;&#xA;`The Delhi Police on Tuesday confirmed that they had rescued suspended Aam Aadmi Party councillor Tahir Hussain from his home in North East Delhi on February 24, when the region was hit by violence due to communal clashes between supporters and opponents of the Citizenship Act.&#xA;Additional Commissioner of Police Ajit Kumar Singla confirmed this to media personnel on Tuesday. “On February 24, around 11 pm to midnight, some people told us that a councillor is stuck and feeling insecure. He was then rescued,” Singla said.&#xA;However, about an hour later, news agency ANI put out a clarification, citing Delhi Police officials, that Hussain “did not require rescuing” that night. “News of the councillor being stuck was received by police, upon investigation, it was found the councillor was safe in his house,” ANI cited unidentified officials as saying.`&#xA;&#xA;In hours, a man was turned from victim to perpetrator. We sure love swift justice, don’t we?&#xA;&#xA;While videos of rioters and Delhi police were making rounds, a set of people were also urging everyone to maintain peace. Suspiciously though, they wanted people like Rana Ayyub to not speak and disturb the peace. She was on channels after channels (mostly international media as our media was too feared to give her airtime) calling out our use of words among other things. What is this request for peace anyway? We are told Prime Minister has tweeted and asked to maintain peace. What does that mean? While Delhi burnt for two days, the same Prime Minister was giggling, waving hands and bear-hugging Donald Trump. I know problems of whataboutery but why did he not tweet then? Did he not have the time? Or did he not wanted to? And even if he had tweeted, what difference would it have made? The people who comprised the mob, do you think they would have stopped? You and I might fall for Modi’s odd-and-even statesmanship but they know him rather too well. They know what he means when he says something and what he means not, they know exactly what he wants from them. We are fools not to see it through. It has been there before our eyes all this time. We have just been choosing to ignore it. We have been choosing to look the other way. We have forgotten Gujarat 2002, they have not. They know who Modi is. If the man indeed wanted peace, why did he not act on Anurag Thakur for his hate speech that resulted in a shooter who walked in front of Delhi police and shot a bullet at the anti-CAA crowd? If Prime Minister of India wanted peace and not riots and deaths, why did he not immediately sack and act against Kapil Mishra who threatened the peaceful protesters? Why was Delhi police standing behind him when he was giving this threat? Why did Prime Minister not act against his Home Minister under whom comes Delhi police? We are too feared to answer these questions. Some of us, especially TV channels, look at them, they won’t even dare to ask these questions. The answer is, he did not want to stop this. Mr Modi wanted this. Look at his politics. It is full of hate and spreading fear. How did you (or I) expect him to behave any differently? We created him. He is a product of our own making. We told ourselves what he was not. We told he was this progressive statesmanlike figure. Was he though? And where did that idea came from? It came from his PR exercise.&#xA;&#xA;`…the media shou